[Bf-vfx] Tomato camera sensor changes

Brecht Van Lommel brechtvanlommel at pandora.be
Wed Nov 9 15:41:20 CET 2011


I agree the Sensor Fit description could be improved. I agree it's a
bit strange how horizontal and vertical work now, it should fit the
image inside the sensor really, not extend beyond it... I'll take a
closer look at this next week and see how we can improve things.

Brecht.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Ejner Fergo <ejnersan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Sorry about the bad formatting in my last mail.
>
> I take back most of what I wrote and tried to illustrate before :P
> I looked through some of the code and see sensor_fit used many places.
> The name works good; "Fit Sensor" -> sensor_fit like for example "X
> Angle" -> angle_x. The description could still need a change IMO.
> I don't mind the camera object changing form between modes anymore. I
> can see that it's just how Blender works, but it doesn't matter as
> long as the render output is correct, and it is.
>
> I made a micro change in the code about how the camera object aspect
> works in different fit-modes. To me this makes more sense, because I
> can see the resolution restricted to the correct axis on the camera
> itself. Patch is here:
> http://www.pasteall.org/26178
> (patch looks weird to me, but works fine, so...)
>
> Only big thing left is the Sensor display option. I tried to have a go
> at it, but didn't come far...
>
> I also saw that changes to FBX are included, thanks!
>
> And two more thanks for your time and tomato in trunk!
>
> Best regards,
> Ejner
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-vfx mailing list
> Bf-vfx at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-vfx
>


More information about the Bf-vfx mailing list