[Bf-vfx] Non-square shapes for pattern and search areas

Troy Sobotka troy.sobotka at gmail.com
Fri Jul 22 17:19:32 CEST 2011


On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:26 AM, François T. <francoistarlier at gmail.com> wrote:

> right now if I track 20 frames, then adjust the pattern or search area,
> track again. Then want to refine/adjust the 20 first frames, my "settings"
> for those frame are lost, I now have the settings of the 21+ frames. You see
> ? I shouldn't have to animate it myself, it should remember my settings
> itself, since tracker settings are not for the footage itself, but for a
> portion of frames (at least it happen often, especially w/ supervised
> tracking)

There should be a little caution here as Blender already has
specifically set up the UI expectations as a mental model.

If we move a Cube mesh on frame 24, we lose the position on the previous frames.

To this end, it would likely be good practice to follow the model
already in place, otherwise we are running the risk of turning Blender
into a nasty monster with expectations within the interface.

That said, we also need a method do solve the above situation. Would
the Auto Key function be a logical thing to use here?

>> - is having numerical value in UI very useful?

I'm with Sergey on this one. I think the numerical values are pretty useful.

>> I would rather resize it on the marker itself than going into the property
>> panel and having to enter numerical value. Trackers have nice UI with square
>> & arrow on the side can't we grab that to do all the manipulation ? (or
>> maybe it is planned but not yet implemented :p )

I think the design choices Sergey has made to include numerical values
here fit within the established paradigm of Blender well too. Nothing
lost for those that want to stick to the purely graphical elements,
and a good deal of high grade granularity for those that require it.

Great work folks. Let's be very careful about the UI decisions.

TJS


More information about the Bf-vfx mailing list