[Bf-modeling] Bevel requirements

[metalliandy]

Yea, I don't have a problem with it. I use offset for 99% of the bevels 
I do so no problems there.
:)

-Andy
On 05/01/2014 00:22, Howard Trickey wrote:
> But do you like the regular bevel using offset as the default? That is 
> the question.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:57 PM, metalliandy 
> <metalliandy666 at googlemail.com <mailto:metalliandy666 at googlemail.com>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Yea, I understand your question, mate. :) I was saying that Offset
>     would be fine as it would match the regular bevel which is using
>     offset as the default.
>
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     -Andy
>     On 04/01/2014 23:35, Howard Trickey wrote:
>>     I was intending to make it consistent with the tool. The question
>>     was whether the
>>     tool (and the modifier) should change the default from Offset to
>>     Width.
>>
>>
>>     On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, metalliandy
>>     <metalliandy666 at googlemail.com
>>     <mailto:metalliandy666 at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         I replied to this a few days ago but it got hung in the
>>         moderation que so I thought I would post it again
>>
>>         I would make it the same as the bevel tool for consistency
>>         tbh., so offset would be fine.
>>
>>         Is there a web portal for this list on the new site? I much
>>         prefer to use those rather than email if possible :)
>>
>>         -Andy
>>         On 29/12/2013 15:26, Howard Trickey wrote:
>>>         I want to put the option for how to measure bevel width (the
>>>         tool's 'Amount Type') into the modifier.  Before I do, I
>>>         wondered what people think the default method should be? The
>>>         old method (and what is assumed by models with bevel
>>>         modifier in files pre 2.70) is the 'Offset' method.  I can
>>>         see the argument for making the 'Width' method the default.
>>>          Have people here tried both extensively enough to have an
>>>         opinion?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Howard Trickey
>>>         <howard.trickey at gmail.com <mailto:howard.trickey at gmail.com>>
>>>         wrote:
>>>
>>>             OK, revision 61221 has these changes.  Let's play with
>>>             them some before putting them in the modifier, since
>>>             that will affect what is saved in .blend files.
>>>
>>>
>>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-modeling/attachments/20140105/7a53aa00/attachment.html>