[Bf-funboard] UI talk + session at bconf

[Jude Jackson]

I don't see why not. Andrew is the top community lobbyist for UI reform, if
the UI review and commit process is in itself flawed, it only makes sense
to bring that up to him. While certainly Andrew is not the one who directly
enacts changes (like you said, that's the BF and especially Ton), it makes
sense to amplify your voice through a spokesperson who gets a lot of
attention. It's a very political approach, but that just means it's
pragmatic.

That said, have you had any luck directly taking your case to Ton and the
foundation?


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Campbell Barton <ideasman42 at gmail.com>wrote:

> In retrospect Davids patch should have been split up (talked on IRC
> and think we both agree on that now)
>
> To give an example on how one small may need review on its own see the
> replies to this tracker item.
>
>
> https://projects.blender.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=36900&group_id=9&atid=498
>
> Functionality is in Blender now but with edits to the proposed solution.
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:35 AM, david j <davidj at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 2013 4:31 PM, "Harley Acheson" <harley.acheson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I hope you are kidding about this, because that does not
> >> sound acceptable at all.  We fully expect you to submit 12
> >> separate 1-line patches.
> >>
> >> LOL
> >
> > Thanks Harley, for injecting some much needed levity. I seriously laughed
> > out loud.
> >
> > A paraphrase of a quote comes to mind..
> >
> > All patches have bugs; all patches can be reduced by one line; therefore,
> > all patches can be reduced to one line of buggy code.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-funboard mailing list
> > Bf-funboard at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
>
>
>
> --
> - Campbell
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-funboard mailing list
> Bf-funboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
>