[Bf-docboard] Propsal: fundamentals, citation
Tobias Heinke
heinke.tobias at t-online.de
Wed Jan 20 00:25:23 CET 2016
Hello again,
Thanks for the quick respond.
The methodology: I planned to achieve on after another:
prealpha: structure, placeholders,
alpha: some text, complete text, truthful text, writing quality,
beta: education (scope: beginner - advanced),reviews
release: improvements, (works?) remove content from the manual
Francesco Siddi [shortened] wrote:
> Did you get in touch/connected with any of the current documentation
maintainers?
No, I only brought it up here.
> Opinion about / have you used current manual?
My opinion: The structure is good, the side menu is great. - so in
general i like it :)
the problems I see: tree depth (menu - on side), the glossary, blender
branding, but let's discuss this later.
I've only fully read the 2.56 wiki. I don't use it, because i've done
theory lately.
Anton Felix Lorenzen [shortened] wrote:
> 1. Teaching fundamentals without any hints how to try it out?
We can link to the blender manual at the end of a paragraph.
In the way: Want to "Try it out" ? go there (manual), then come back and
continue reading.
> 2. MediaWiki / migration
For me every online software documentation is a "wiki" and with
"migration" i meant the movement of content to newer blender versions,
not the change of used software. I'm sorry, I have to be more precise.
> 3. Someone has to take care of it. It would involve a lot of
writing, I guess.
If you remove the examples and software specifics from other manuals,
you end up with an small essence.
Sure it has to be general and limited in detail.
Greetings
Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20160120/07b54ec9/attachment.htm
More information about the Bf-docboard
mailing list