[Bf-cycles] Micropolygon implementation
Michael Fox
mfoxdogg at gmail.com
Sat Jan 4 11:55:50 CET 2014
what luxrender use for their mpoly displacments
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~bes/papers/height/paper.html
On 01/04/2014 04:26 PM, Matt Ebb wrote:
> On 4 January 2014 11:57, Nathan Vegdahl <cessen at cessen.com
> <mailto:cessen at cessen.com>> wrote:
>
> Regarding Monsters 2: I'm probably being needlessly pedantic here,
> but isn't RenderMan's raytracing still based on on-the-fly
> tesselation into micropolygon grids (using a geometry cache
> iirc)? Maybe that doesn't technically count as micropolygon
> rendering, but I still think of it as being strongly related.
> It's sort of best-of-both-worlds: you get proper higher-order
> surfaces and displacements, and you also get ray traced global
> illumination.
>
> It's also ridiculously slow, so in practice you get nothing at all,
> hence the full pathtracing mode coming in prman 19. For many (most?)
> types of production scenes these days a modern raytracer beats the
> pants off renderman's GI, and the set of those scenes is growing, not
> shrinking as time goes by.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20140104/03cfda35/attachment.htm
More information about the Bf-cycles
mailing list