[Bf-committers] Linux x86 Builds

[Shaul Kedem]

How can 2.4 not be official if there are distributions out there which use
2.4 in their stable tree?

On 5/11/07, Stephen Swaney <sswaney at centurytel.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 06:03:00AM -0700, Ken Hughes wrote:
>
> > A question for 64-bit linux builds: should I be making all four builds
> > also?  I thought the devision was not to do Python 2.4 builds this
> > time.  And to refresh my memory,  static and dynamic refer to OpenGL?
>
> Static vs dynamic refers to OpenGL.  Status uses software rendering,
> dynamic uses the (hopefully) accellerated OpenGL on the local box.
>
> Py 2.5 is our 'official' version.  Doing a 2.4 is not a requirement,
> but might be nice if you have the time & resources.  Otherwise....
> let them upgrade!  Lazy whiners.  Pre-fab retort: "you are running
> a state of the art 64 bit machine, but using your grandmother's python?"
>
> --
> Stephen Swaney
> sswaney at centurytel.net
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>
> 
>
>
>


!DSPAM:18,4644a0af916831073343164!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/attachments/20070511/25b7e052/attachment.html