[Verse-dev] Bugs in verse

David Given dg at cowlark.com
Sun Nov 21 23:41:52 CET 2010


On 21/11/10 21:37, eskil at obsession.se wrote:
[...]
> The first one isn't really a bug in verse, it looks like its compiler bug.

Compiler bugs are always fun.

I've just tried building it with various options:

gcc -O0 -> works
gcc -O1 -> works
gcc -O2 -> fails
gcc -O3 -> fails
gcc -Os -> fails

clang -O0 -> works
clang -O1 -> works
clang -O2 -> works
clang -O3 -> works
clang -Os -> works

I bet the gcc people are going to be thrilled.

-- 
┌─── dg@cowlark.com ───── http://www.cowlark.com ─────
│ "There does not now, nor will there ever, exist a programming
│ language in which it is the least bit hard to write bad programs." ---
│ Flon's Axiom

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.blender.org/mailman/private/verse-dev/attachments/20101121/ece9166f/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Verse-dev mailing list