[Soc-2012-dev] Missing week 3 reports

[Philipp Volguine]

Ok I will elaborate on my wiki page today, I didn't know it has to be that
detailed.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Ton Roosendaal <ton at blender.org> wrote:

> Hi Philipp,
>
> With all due respect, but I don't consider this a good report, especially
> because you don't give evidence you've actually done work.
>
> If you spend a day on studying a topic, then allocate 10% of your time in
> producing notes about what you've learnt.
>
> If you spend a few days on getting familiar with Blender code, spend at
> least one day on producing a document that shows how the code works, and
> what you've learned. Very helpful for others too.
>
> Always, at any time, be prepared to show your involvement, activity and
> progress. Brecht is not the only person who's interested in your progress!
>
> Regards,
>
> -Ton-
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation   ton at blender.org    www.blender.org
> Blender Institute   Entrepotdok 57A  1018AD Amsterdam   The Netherlands
>
> On 12 Jun, 2012, at 8:02, Philipp Volguine wrote:
>
> > Whoops, here it is:
> > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Zer000
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Tom M <letterrip at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi I seem to not have status updates from Phillipp Volguine and Andrei
> Simionescu please try them in asap.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Soc-2012-dev mailing list
> > Soc-2012-dev at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/soc-2012-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Soc-2012-dev mailing list
> Soc-2012-dev at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/soc-2012-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/soc-2012-dev/attachments/20120612/646a46f6/attachment.htm