[Bf-viewport] What format will the render be?

[Jorge Bernal]

You can do the light culling pass using opencl. This way you avoid the use
of compute shader.

In this link (at thread bottom) is the investigation about forward+ that i
did several weeks ago for upbge "fork".

Regards
El 23/8/2016 5:50 p. m., "Mike Erwin" <significant.bit at gmail.com> escribió:

> We still need to work some of these things out.
>
> I like the flexibility of forward+. Will we be able to implement that in
> OpenGL 3.2? Thinking of the compute part. Even latest Mac OS is stuck on GL
> 4.1 with no compute shaders. Worth investigating!
>
> PBR definitely, Clément knows more about this. Support workflows targeting
> Cycles, targeting Unreal. We can mine Unreal for ideas. PBR will be the
> usual best viewing mode, but not the only option. Some projects don't
> need a "final" render or realistic materials.
>
> For example UI elements & widgets can use a totally different shading
> model but still be integrated into the scene among fully shaded objects.
>
> Short answer: we still need to decide what is needed & how feasible
> are the things we want. Brainstorm here, then make a design task on dev.b.o?
>
> On Tuesday, August 23, 2016, Jacob Merrill <blueprintrandom1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Will the viewport renderer use Forward+ rendering?
>>
>> some sort of programmable pipeline?
>>
>> PBR?
>>
>> is there a document I can read for the render type/capabilities?
>>
>
>
> --
> Mike Erwin
> musician, naturalist, pixel pusher, hacker extraordinaire
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-viewport mailing list
> Bf-viewport at blender.org
> https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-viewport
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-viewport/attachments/20160823/9e6d90c1/attachment.htm