[Bf-python] Ipo/IpoCurve API revisited

[Stephen Swaney]

On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 11:09:48AM -0800, Ken Hughes wrote:

> This didn't tkae as long as I thought it would.  However, I'm going to 
> be out-of-town for a few days and don't want to commit anything which 
> might break something (I've tested but not ultra-thoroughly) so I put it 
> on the patch tracker in case someone wants to play with it:
> 
> https://projects.blender.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=4001&group_id=9&atid=127
> 

Looks good at first glance! 

getCurve(), getCurves() vs Get()

I realize we are dealing with legacy code here.  However, most of our
bpy types have a Get method that either returns a named object, or a
list of objects depending on the argument supplied to Get.  This is
slightly different since here we have an instance rather than a class
or type.  Maybe overloading the getCurve() method to return a list
when called with no args is the right thing to do?

-- 
Stephen Swaney
sswaney at centurytel.net