[Bf-python] Re: Request for adding a proposed new feature

[Wouter van Heyst]

On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 12:04:31PM +1100, Campbell Barton wrote:
> Ken Hughes wrote:
> >Willian Padovani Germano wrote:
> >>Ken Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >>>(1) did we decide during the Sunday morning meeting a few weeks ago 
> >>>to use objects.remove() instead of .unlink()?  Or did Cam or I 
> >>>misquote the method earlier?
> >>
> >>Campbell had renamed to .unlink, from what I recall (cvs log), may be 
> >>wrong. Better wait for what he says about this.
> >
> >/me pokes Campbell
> >
> >Ken
> >_______________________________________________
> >Bf-python mailing list
> >Bf-python at projects.blender.org
> >http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-python
> >
> 
> We decieded to use .link() instead of pythons .add() or .append(), so as 
> not to be confusing. the opposite of .link() is .unlink() and also, on 
> the basis the decision was made, .unlink() is more blender like then 
> remove. its also more consistent with the current python API.

It is also the canonical name of unix `rm` :)

Wouter van Heyst