[Bf-python] CurNurb/IpoCurve/BezTriple hackery

[Ken Hughes]

Stephen Swaney wrote:
> I think a better way to do this is to implement operator[] like
> we did with CurNurbs.  Having iterators lets us write
> things like 
> for p in some_ipo_curve:
>   # do something with a point
> 
> This also lets us operate on control points directly via the
> ipocurve[i] syntax and makes Curves and Ipos behave in a similar
> fashion; part of that unification thingie we are talking about.

One other point; for the work I'm doing on the unification, should
I assume you prefer for Ipocurves to work like CurNurbs?  Iterators
and such, get rid of getPoints(), etc?  I think that's what the
wiki page describes, but hadn't thought about describing it that
way explicitly.

Thanks -- Ken