[Bf-docboard] Composite Nodes
Alban
shopaaholiq at gmail.com
Mon Jan 26 13:25:45 CET 2015
Sorry does that mean I should?
On 26/01/2015 10:53 PM, Greg Zaal wrote:
> Great - maybe just add a comment and attach it there.
>
> On 26 January 2015 at 14:22, Alban <shopaaholiq at gmail.com
> <mailto:shopaaholiq at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> No I didn't, thanks!
>
> Should I resubmit the diff?
>
> Alban.
>
>
>
> On 26/01/2015 10:44 PM, Gaia wrote:
>> Did you try to add the new files to svn with:
>>
>> svn add path_to_new_file
>>
>> then svn diff should also find them.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Gaia
>>
>>
>> On 26.01.2015 13:10, Alban wrote:
>>> Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> What I've done is remove most of the text from
>>> manual/composite_nodes/types/filter.rst and placed it into new
>>> files according to node which I've then attached to the diff.
>>> Perhaps there is a better way of doing this I don't know about,
>>> otherwise any modifications in those files from the original
>>> does not show up in the diff viewer. It might make more sense
>>> when you look at it.
>>>
>>> I used 'svn diff manual/composite_nodes/types/ > file.diff'.
>>> When I try 'svn diff >> file.diff' It doesn't seem to include
>>> the new files though it does include changes I've made to other
>>> files.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Alban.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26/01/2015 10:18 PM, Greg Zaal wrote:
>>>> Thanks Alban!
>>>>
>>>> I'll take a look at it when I get home tonight.
>>>>
>>>> I know images can't be handled with diffs, but I though
>>>> adding/removing/renaming files works fine? Are you using `svn
>>>> diff >> file.diff` or some other command?
>>>>
>>>> On 26 January 2015 at 13:33, Alban <shopaaholiq at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:shopaaholiq at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've created D1024 as an initial response to T42947. Do I
>>>> get some
>>>> feedback on this at some point?
>>>>
>>>> It seems to me that taking on this task requires editing a
>>>> significant
>>>> number of files in such a way that is not very compatible
>>>> with the diff
>>>> revision system. Since I am splitting out most of the
>>>> content into
>>>> attachments there is no easy way for a reviewer to see what
>>>> has changed.
>>>>
>>>> Do I keep working on this now or wait until someone makes a
>>>> decision
>>>> which would affect this? If I can get this reviewed now it
>>>> will be a lot
>>>> easier for me to make the changes I want to make next.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Alban O'Brien.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bf-docboard mailing list
>>>> Bf-docboard at blender.org <mailto:Bf-docboard at blender.org>
>>>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bf-docboard mailing list
>>>> Bf-docboard at blender.org <mailto:Bf-docboard at blender.org>
>>>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bf-docboard mailing list
>>> Bf-docboard at blender.org <mailto:Bf-docboard at blender.org>
>>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-docboard mailing list
>> Bf-docboard at blender.org <mailto:Bf-docboard at blender.org>
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org <mailto:Bf-docboard at blender.org>
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20150126/1e1fbc79/attachment.htm
More information about the Bf-docboard
mailing list