[Bf-docboard] Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11

[Matthias Bärlocher]

Hello,

I thought about an object function, which does bevel greyscale images (don't forget transparency)...
If a programmer is a hyper math, would even be a rgb animated object shape be an idea. For video clips or other probably application. Should be possible on missuse of the rgb num...

regards
Matthias Bärlocher

> From: bf-docboard-request at blender.org
> Subject: Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11
> To: bf-docboard at blender.org
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:00:02 +0100
> 
> Send Bf-docboard mailing list submissions to
> 	bf-docboard at blender.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	bf-docboard-request at blender.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	bf-docboard-owner at blender.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Bf-docboard digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Search Engine Optimization: "Experts" Team + Basic todos
>       (mindrones)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:39:20 +0100
> From: mindrones <mindrones at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] Search Engine Optimization: "Experts" Team
> 	+ Basic todos
> To: bf-docboard at blender.org
> Message-ID: <4EB9D9C8.8090006 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/05/2011 06:01 PM, Brecht Van Lommel wrote:
> 
> > From what I understand, ranking of a page is still mostly determined
> > by websites linking to them. There are many websites linking to the
> > old documentation, and on the one hand it's ok that they are permanent
> > links to a particular version, but on the other hand this means that
> > even now that the 2.5 release cycle is finished, the 2.4 documentation
> > still ranks higher.
> > 
> > The only possible solutions I can think of would be to make Doc:Manual
> > the 2.6 manual (brings its own set of issues), and to not let google
> > index the 2.4 manual (would hurt overall ranking?). Hopefully there's
> > another solution that I don't know of...
> 
> 
> I think that solution is giving a lower priority to 2.4 pages:
> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=71936#prioritize
> 
> Just found it. SEO is currently not our first priority, but good to know.
> 
> Later on using robots.txt we can completely remove 2.4 manual from
> crawling, but not now.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Luca
> 
> _____________________________
> 
> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Mindrones
> http://www.mindrones.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> 
> 
> End of Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11
> *******************************************
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20111111/431cd983/attachment.htm