<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
Hello,<br><br>I thought about an object function, which does bevel greyscale images (don't forget transparency)...<br>If a programmer is a hyper math, would even be a rgb animated object shape be an idea. For video clips or other probably application. Should be possible on missuse of the rgb num...<br><br>regards<br>Matthias Bärlocher<br><br><div>> From: bf-docboard-request@blender.org<br>> Subject: Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11<br>> To: bf-docboard@blender.org<br>> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:00:02 +0100<br>> <br>> Send Bf-docboard mailing list submissions to<br>> bf-docboard@blender.org<br>> <br>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard<br>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>> bf-docboard-request@blender.org<br>> <br>> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>> bf-docboard-owner@blender.org<br>> <br>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>> than "Re: Contents of Bf-docboard digest..."<br>> <br>> <br>> Today's Topics:<br>> <br>> 1. Re: Search Engine Optimization: "Experts" Team + Basic todos<br>> (mindrones)<br>> <br>> <br>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 1<br>> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:39:20 +0100<br>> From: mindrones <mindrones@gmail.com><br>> Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] Search Engine Optimization: "Experts" Team<br>> + Basic todos<br>> To: bf-docboard@blender.org<br>> Message-ID: <4EB9D9C8.8090006@gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>> <br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> On 11/05/2011 06:01 PM, Brecht Van Lommel wrote:<br>> <br>> > From what I understand, ranking of a page is still mostly determined<br>> > by websites linking to them. There are many websites linking to the<br>> > old documentation, and on the one hand it's ok that they are permanent<br>> > links to a particular version, but on the other hand this means that<br>> > even now that the 2.5 release cycle is finished, the 2.4 documentation<br>> > still ranks higher.<br>> > <br>> > The only possible solutions I can think of would be to make Doc:Manual<br>> > the 2.6 manual (brings its own set of issues), and to not let google<br>> > index the 2.4 manual (would hurt overall ranking?). Hopefully there's<br>> > another solution that I don't know of...<br>> <br>> <br>> I think that solution is giving a lower priority to 2.4 pages:<br>> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=71936#prioritize<br>> <br>> Just found it. SEO is currently not our first priority, but good to know.<br>> <br>> Later on using robots.txt we can completely remove 2.4 manual from<br>> crawling, but not now.<br>> <br>> <br>> Regards,<br>> Luca<br>> <br>> _____________________________<br>> <br>> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/User:Mindrones<br>> http://www.mindrones.com<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Bf-docboard mailing list<br>> Bf-docboard@blender.org<br>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard<br>> <br>> <br>> End of Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11<br>> *******************************************<br></div> </div></body>
</html>