[Bf-docboard] No Choice of License

[joe]

GPL or complient sounds good for scripts. . .not all scripts would be
appropriate for the GPL (like the pynode cookbook ones) but should still be
compatible.

Joe

On 6/15/08, Matt Ebb <matt at mke3.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Tobias Regenbrecht <regenbrecht at gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm definitely not a main contributer, but I would very much appreciate
> it if
> > the blender manual would get a license that is compatible with the
> wikibooks
> > license.
> >
> > This would allow it to copy from and to the "noob to pro" book, which
> would be
> > benifitial for both sides.
>
> The reason for this entire discussion is to do with the license of
> scripts and other code that is in the wiki. The license of the
> documentation itself is not in question - nobody has proposed to
> change that from Open Content. What is in question is scripts, since
> right now it seems that there's a blanket all-encompassing Open
> Content license claimed for everything in the wiki, which may not be
> so good for included scripts.
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20080616/757e011d/attachment.htm