[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-10-22

Troy Sobotka troy.sobotka at gmail.com
Tue Oct 23 19:24:48 CEST 2018


On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 9:53 AM Brecht Van Lommel <brechtvanlommel at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> I don't personally mind removing the old RRT and Film transforms for
> example, as Filmic provides a good replacement. But renaming e.g. "sRGB" to
> "sRGB Native 2.2" or "Filmic" to "Filmic Log Encoding Base" is in my
> opinion not an improvement, and certainly not worth breaking compatibility
> over. It also changes American to British spelling for example.
>

I'm fine with these sorts of changes in the bigger picture.

As we have discussed before, I also do not think we should require a look
> to be specified for the Filmic view transform to give correct results, the
> None look should work too.
>

None does work. It delivers a log base image, which is rather important for
plenty of folks, not the least of which was the BI's Agent.

Specifically, if the config defaults to a look on top of the log base, it
would be impossible to replicate what the actual BI did for Agent. That
seems odd, no?

None of these things are very difficult to fix, all I'm asking is if you
> want to contribute an improved configuration, please do it in a way that
> tries to preserve compatibility where reasonable and with an explanation of
> why the cases that break compatibility are acceptable.
>

I'm not resisting this. At all.

I'll push a branch that tries to maintain compatibility on naming.

T


More information about the Bf-committers mailing list