[Bf-committers] [Bf-blender-cvs] SVN commit: /data/svn/bf-blender [60875] tags/blender-2.69-release/blender: svn merge ^/trunk/blender -c60755 -c60766 -c60792 -c60796

[Thomas Dinges]

My point here is, that we agreed on doing proper proper Release 
Candidates and Release now.
I don't mind a small one-liner, in this case we could risk it.

But since  RC2 we had 60845, 60871 and 60875 with backports...also not 
all of them seem to be really showstopper bugs?

I know we have a lot to handle this week, but I see no reason to rush 
the release. If we can't handle it properly this week, do it next week.

Am 21.10.2013 14:57, schrieb Thomas Dinges:
> Yesterday we talked about just 1 or 2 one-liners, and now it's getting
> more.
> In this case we maybe should consider doing a RC3...
>
> Also, we should only backport regressions. Is 60774 a regression?
>
> Am 21.10.2013 14:41, schrieb Antony Riakiotakis:
>> Hey Campbell, could you merge 60774 as well?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-blender-cvs mailing list
>> Bf-blender-cvs at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-blender-cvs
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers