[Bf-committers] Blender FX Proposal
g.mariani at liquidnet.it
Fri Mar 30 20:09:46 CEST 2012
Mmmm I tend to disagree here!
When you're animating having a fast viewport speed is a must. Don't want to
lose time doing OpenGl previews just to get a the feeling of your timing.
You need to be able to hit play and see the result of your work in realtime.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Knapp <magick.crow at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Jason Wilkins
> <jason.a.wilkins at gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is a continuation of my thread seeking feedback about improving
> > Blender's view drawing code. Previously titled "Compositing Viewport"
> > The game engine contains a feature that is a subset of what my
> > proposal would do. The Filter2D actuators let the user write GLSL
> > programs that can refer to various "standard" buffers and which can be
> > arranged in linear passes.
> > It would be weird if core Blender had more powerful view drawing code
> > than the game engine rasterizer :-)
> I am not so sure that is true. The game must keep the frame rates high
> for good animation. The normal window does not need this as badly but
> does need very good quality renders at all times. Dropping to frame
> rates as low as 12 or maybe better 24 would not kill most desktop
> stuff but no gamer would like it.
> > So, my question here is: insofar as there is overlap between the game
> > engine and a new view port, how should I approach preventing
> > duplication?
> Douglas E Knapp
> Creative Commons Film Group, Helping people make open source movies
> with open source software!
> Massage in Gelsenkirchen-Buer:
> Please link to me and trade links with me!
> Open Source Sci-Fi mmoRPG Game project.
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
More information about the Bf-committers