[Bf-committers] Clay Tool Bug

[Jason Wilkins]

Submitted to the tracker.  I really appreciate your testing Vox, as it
shows the difference quite well.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vox Lapin <voxelbunny at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please do put it in the tracker so it doesn't get lost in the mail.
>
> Solid +1.
>
> In my experience, the subjective uncontrollability with the existing clay
> code is "bubbliness" -- since the orientation of each face was less tied to
> its original orientation, the faces tended to have their old relationships
> lost in noise and go out of control. I tried an example joining two
> cylinders with the old and new code.
>
> Here's the old code, no accumulation. You can see the bulging of the mesh
> where the orientation of the faces got repeatedly modified in each stroke
> exec, with concomitant distortion.
> http://www.pasteall.org/pic/14033
>
> Here's the new code, no accumulation. You can see there's much less bulging
> and distortion; the join is better too.
> http://pasteall.org/pic/14034
>
> New code with accumulation closely approximates the old behavior.
> http://pasteall.org/pic/14035
>
> If this doesn't go in trunk, I'm going to keep it in my build, it's
> invaluable for sculpting.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Swaney <sswaney at centurytel.net>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:01:33AM -0500, Jason Wilkins wrote:
>> > Ah, didn't realize attachments won't work, here:
>> >
>> > http://www.pasteall.org/22585
>>
>> We also have a patch tracker for just this purpose.
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Swaney
>> sswaney at centurytel.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>