[Bf-committers] Meeting notes, 19 sept 2010

[Ton Roosendaal]

Hi,

This I meant:

> - don't rna wrap C code which is work in progress?
> - don't port unfinished C code to python?


But modifiying existing code is fine, provided no functionality gets  
lost, and preferably provided things then fucntion better for end- 
users even!

A good example is the render api, this is not well designed yet, and  
hasn't been used optimally inside Blender either. It's for me still a  
WIP.
Same goes for most of the Window Manager WM calls.

-Ton-

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation   ton at blender.org    www.blender.org
Blender Institute   Entrepotdok 57A  1018AD Amsterdam   The Netherlands

On 20 Sep, 2010, at 4:36, Campbell Barton wrote:

>> - Campbell reports we need to work still on how Python operators work
>> within or without context ('data' context). The meeting discussed  
>> some
>> cases, but no clear answers popped up yet. Ton mentioned to at least
>> not try to Pytonify the C code when that's not fully finished or  
>> frozen.
>
> Can you clarify what you mean by "Pytonify the C code"
> - don't rna wrap C code which is work in progress?
> - don't modify behavior of C code to work better with python?
> - don't port unfinished C code to python?
>
> Is this something which has happened before you want to prevent? or is
> this more a general concern.
>
> Realize this sounds pedantic but if I'm to be sure not to do it I want
> to be clear on what you say :)
>
> - Campbell
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers