[Bf-committers] Layer system code

[David Bryant]

I don' t know.It works.It's been tested by people that have downloaded it 
and gave it feedback.It's been debugged.It saves the names in the .blend 
files.It's backward compatible with previous .blend files.
I  don't know but I don't like to argue either.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "trip somewhere" <trip0o at gmail.com>
To: "bf-blender developers" <bf-committers at blender.org>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Layer system code


> Heres a visual.
> http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7269/fakeio8.jpg
>
> Ah drat, you posted to soon :p
>
> I just find all of the layers fighting so dumb. I really want named
> layers, but not extra features, just named layers. So why is it so
> hard to get past the SVN crew is my curiosity. Cause I keep seeing all
> of these crazy proposals, when just some text will do for now.
>
> On Jan 7, 2008 3:48 PM, David Bryant <aceone at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> I already have a working named layer system that actually does what it's
>> supposed to do.Even when scenes change, the layers can be renamed to fit 
>> the
>> circumstances of that particular scene.A blank layer palate is created 
>> for
>> that particular scene.You can try the latest build (Named Layers 9) at
>> Graphicall.org.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "trip somewhere" <trip0o at gmail.com>
>> To: "bf-blender developers" <bf-committers at blender.org>
>> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 3:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Bf-committers] Layer system code
>>
>>
>> > It's nice. But how hard would it be to just rip some of the code that
>> > is used for the materials, or texture buttons. Or anywhere there is a
>> > "named toggle" and just plant that on a new palate that shows the
>> > layers button?
>> >
>> > It does not even have to do my mock up. Just copy the code thats n the
>> > tool header for layers, plant that into a new palate, and put a fake
>> > table of 20 rows next to them and allow text input. Save.
>> >
>> > *Poof* named layers. And Nothing new happens. just a new palate that
>> > NO one has to use. But it beats writing it down on paper.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Jan 7, 2008 3:20 PM, David Bryant <aceone at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I had a thought this morning.
>> >> What if Groups had visibility toggles(visible/invisible).
>> >> Then even with the 20 standard layers which can be named,groups (which
>> >> already can be named) can act as sublayers as well.Thus removing the 
>> >> need
>> >> for a total revamp of the layer system and giving additional
>> >> theoretically
>> >> more pseudo layers.One additional benifit is that it will fit easier 
>> >> with
>> >> the 2.5 recode project with minimal effort.
>> >>
>> >> I'm going to toy around with the codebase this week and test it 
>> >> out.But,
>> >> let
>> >> me know what you think.
>> >>
>> >> Digikiller
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Bf-committers mailing list
>> >> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Bf-committers mailing list
>> > Bf-committers at blender.org
>> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers