[Bf-committers] Re: [Bf-blender-cvs] CVS commit: Loop selection Ignore above-read this one!
ilac
bf-committers@blender.org
Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:10:04 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C39B0A.118D5880
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Argh!! When it converted to text only it changed the structure of my =
email which gave most sentences a completly opposite tone!! Sorry! =
Fixed below! (I hope) :o)
----- Original (but Fixed) Message -----=20
From: "ilac"
To: <bf-committers@blender.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Bf-blender-cvs] CVS commit: Loop selection
> Sorry, I may have sounded a little more sarcastic than I hoped :)
No problem! :o) Such misunderstandings are one of the annoying and =
unfortunate
things about non-face-to-face communication. Avoiding any sarcasm in =
writing
is appreciated! Thanks :o)
> It IS possible to decide if an edge belongs to another selected face.
> If someone would implement it this way, he would run into a whole
> bunch of other "what-if's".
>
> I don't know if it's wise to bother the user with popups asking
> him what he wants to deselect and how he wants to deselect it...
Not really an issue at this point but I saw this as a selection in user =
prefs rather
than a constant pop-up - which i agree would be very annoying!
> so! my final say on this:
>
> 1) shift-like behaviour COULD be programmed (difficult)
> 2) it is questionable if it could be as predictable as
> shift with vertex-select.
> 3) I'm not programming it because I think it is not usefull
> if anyone else thinks it is, and it is needed, be my guest :)
>
> One thing is for sure, blender's mesh structure is not made for stuff
> like this :)
>
> Roel
Ok! :o) Point taken! Although if someone ever does it's going to mean
re-arranging of hot-keys again but this is currently a non-issue seeing =
that
this is one of the topics up for revision in the near future especially =
for
what-if situtations!! :)On the plus side-keeping 'R' makes it more =
readily
accessible to my left(keyboard) hand which is a good thing! :o)
Thanks again, for the new features and taking the time to dicuss your =
reasons!
Regards,
Fabrizio
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C39B0A.118D5880
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Argh!! When it converted to text only =
it changed=20
the structure of my email which gave most sentences a completly opposite =
tone!!=20
Sorry! Fixed below! (I hope) :o)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>----- Original (but Fixed) =
Message -----=20
</FONT>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>From: "ilac"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>To: <</FONT><A=20
href=3D"mailto:bf-committers@blender.org"><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>bf-committers@blender.org</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 2:46=20
PM</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Subject: Re: [Bf-blender-cvs] CVS =
commit: Loop=20
selection</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><!--StartFragment --><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> > Sorry, =
I may have=20
sounded a little more sarcastic than I hoped :)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>No problem! :o) Such misunderstandings =
are one of=20
the annoying and unfortunate<BR>things about non-face-to-face =
communication.=20
Avoiding any sarcasm in writing<BR>is appreciated! Thanks =
:o)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>> It IS possible to decide if an =
edge belongs to=20
another selected face.<BR>> If someone would implement it this way, =
he would=20
run into a whole<BR>> bunch of other "what-if's".<BR>><BR>> I =
don't=20
know if it's wise to bother the user with popups asking<BR>> him what =
he=20
wants to deselect and how he wants to deselect it...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Not really an issue at this point but I =
saw this as=20
a selection in user prefs rather<BR>than a constant pop-up - which i =
agree would=20
be very annoying!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>> so! my final say on =
this:<BR>><BR>> 1)=20
shift-like behaviour COULD be programmed (difficult)<BR>> 2) it is=20
questionable if it could be as predictable as<BR>> =
shift=20
with vertex-select.<BR>> 3) I'm not programming it because I think it =
is not=20
usefull<BR>> if anyone else thinks it is, and it is =
needed,=20
be my guest :)<BR>><BR>> One thing is for sure, blender's mesh =
structure=20
is not made for stuff<BR>> like this :)<BR>><BR>> =
Roel</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ok! :o) Point taken! Although if =
someone ever=20
does it's going to mean<BR>re-arranging of hot-keys again but this is =
currently=20
a non-issue seeing that<BR>this is one of the topics up for revision in =
the near=20
future especially for<BR>what-if situtations!! :)On the plus =
side-keeping 'R'=20
makes it more readily<BR>accessible to my left(keyboard) hand which is a =
good=20
thing! :o)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks again, for the new features and =
taking the=20
time to dicuss your reasons!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>Fabrizio</FONT></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C39B0A.118D5880--