[Bf-docboard] Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 103, Issue 4

Ivan Paulos Tomé greylica at gmail.com
Thu Sep 19 15:54:21 CEST 2013


Hi Ton !
Hi All !

A move to Open Publication will sanction some of the
common practices nowadays.

Both licenses here:

http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml (1998)

This one from 1998 is being used by blenderwiki.

http://opencontent.org/openpub/ (1999)

Newest one.

Cheers !



2013/9/19 <bf-docboard-request at blender.org>

> Send Bf-docboard mailing list submissions to
>         bf-docboard at blender.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         bf-docboard-request at blender.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         bf-docboard-owner at blender.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Bf-docboard digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Wiki Documentation License (Ton Roosendaal)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:26:05 +0200
> From: Ton Roosendaal <ton at blender.org>
> Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] Wiki Documentation License
> To: Blender Documentation Project <bf-docboard at blender.org>
> Message-ID: <CE6F24D3-AB02-40FC-85C0-4A0B588118AB at blender.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I presume the issue is not raising much questions or resistance. It's more
> or less cosmetic anyway, being official FSF compatible for docs is never a
> bad thing anyway.
>
> To be sure this change is well understood I'll connect in person with some
> of the frequent contributors though. Will do after my holidays early
> october. If that goes fine we then can officially move to the OPL.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Ton-
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Ton Roosendaal  -  ton at blender.org   -   www.blender.org
> Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
> Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
>
>
>
> On 30 Aug, 2013, at 0:15, W. Nelson wrote:
>
> > In a coincidence, I am headed to an Internet copyright lecture tonight
> by a expert lawyer on the topic.  If anyone can think of some specific
> questions to ask I will do so and post back to this group.  It is shortly
> after 3pm Pacific Time so the lecture starts in 4 hours.  I will check this
> email just before the Q&A segment.
> >
> > Please ask any relevant questions you can think of to ask and I will see
> what she says.
> > JTa
> >
> >
> > From: Ton Roosendaal <ton at blender.org>
> > To: Blender Documentation Project <bf-docboard at blender.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:56 AM
> > Subject: [Bf-docboard] Wiki Documentation License
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I hardly ever check it, and I don't think many people really did. But
> it's good to have this issue well sorted out, especially when others want
> to use the content here.
> >
> > The status now:
> > http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/BlenderWiki:Copyrights
> >
> > Which leads to:
> > http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml
> >
> > The license is available in two versions, both confusingly named OPL.
> The newer one:
> > http://opencontent.org/openpub/
> >
> > The original OPL has been marked by FSF as "non free", due to the
> commercial restrictions worded it in it. Probably this line:
> >
> > "You may not charge a fee for the sole service of providing access to
> and/or use of the OC via
> > a network".
> >
> > The new OPL has been defined FSF as 'free license' and 'copyleft', they
> just don't recommond it.
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpenPublicationL
> >
> > Within the spirit of Blender's project here (GNU GPL copyleft), I think
> the 2nd version of OPL aligns with how Blender coders would need to handle
> their contributions. We could even consider (because of the link to this
> opencontent site) that both licenses are valid?
> >
> > I'd like to first see some feedback from others about it here though.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -Ton-
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > Ton Roosendaal  -  ton at blender.org  -  www.blender.org
> > Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
> > Entrepotdok 57A  -  1018AD Amsterdam  -  The Netherlands
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-docboard mailing list
> > Bf-docboard at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-docboard mailing list
> > Bf-docboard at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
>
> End of Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 103, Issue 4
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20130919/01f1248e/attachment.htm 


More information about the Bf-docboard mailing list