[Bf-docboard] Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 103, Issue 12

Jim Tucker jim.tucker at live.co.uk
Tue Oct 1 16:21:04 CEST 2013


Hi Marco,
The count for wiki pages was obtained   for the Sept 2013  TOC.  Some of the difference between your TOC page counts will be due to my not  taking into account the new Chapter on the "Non-Photorealistic -Freestyle" which I have not yet entered into the spreadsheet.   I am not sure where the remaining errors occur - I intend to reconstruct a TOC from my list and do a diff between the two (but this will not be for a few weeks as I'm just off on holiday).
 
Thanks for pointing out the discrepancies between our results - I could easily have missed a few pages during my trawl through the wiki. But I hope  my work will still  give some useful pointers as to how much new effort in updating the wiki  is required, and where this can most usefully be applied.
 
Jim Tucker (sculptorjim)
 
 

 
> From: bf-docboard-request at blender.org
> Subject: Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 103, Issue 12
> To: bf-docboard at blender.org
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:00:01 +0200
> 
> Send Bf-docboard mailing list submissions to
> 	bf-docboard at blender.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	bf-docboard-request at blender.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	bf-docboard-owner at blender.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Bf-docboard digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Wiki Update Status? (marco ardito)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:45:25 +0200
> From: marco ardito <ardito at apiform.to.it>
> Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] Wiki Update Status?
> To: bf-docboard at blender.org
> Message-ID: <52494835.2070708 at apiform.to.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256"
> 
> Hi, about:
> 
> > Overall (since Nov 2012) 59 of the total 619 wiki pages have been 
> > added/updated - congratulations to everyone involved!!
> 
> how did you count wiki pages? was that the number of september 2012, 
> which you used to compare with their respective current versions?
> 
> currently just the english TOC manual has more than 640 wiki links... 
> (just a few "doubles", too :-( )
> 
> in the meanwhile, for other purposes, I did an automated analysis of the 
> wiki manual pages translations...
> 
> I compared the 20+ translated wiki manual TOCs for their "manual" links 
> to the base, english one.
> 
> EN pages: 644 - english TOC has 644 "manual" links.
> 
> here is the report for all existent translation of - at least - the TOC.
> - missing, means how many *identical* links are missing compared to the 
> base english TOC
> - different, means how many links hat TOC has which ar *not* in the base 
> english TOC
> - convergence (%) gives an indication of how much the translated manual 
> TOC is "compatible" with the base english TOC
> this is calculated as (EN pages - XX missing)/ EN pages
> - divergence (%)gives an indication of how much the translated manual 
> TOC is "not compatible" with the base english TOC
> this is calculated as (XX different/XX missing)
> 
> AR missing: 633  different: 0    convergence: 1.71       divergence: 0.00
> BG missing: 634  different: 8    convergence: 1.55       divergence: 1.26
> CA missing: 629  different: 0    convergence: 2.33       divergence: 0.00
> CZ missing: 573  different: 8    convergence: 11.02      divergence: 1.40
> DE missing: 389  different: 1    convergence: 39.60      divergence: 0.26
> DK missing: 644  different: 1    convergence: 0.00       divergence: 0.16
> EL missing: 560  different: 92   convergence: 13.04      divergence: 16.43
> EO missing: 643  different: 0    convergence: 0.16       divergence: 0.00
> ES missing: 403  different: 19   convergence: 37.42      divergence: 4.71
> ET missing: 259  different: 37   convergence: 59.78      divergence: 14.29
> FA missing: 626  different: 0    convergence: 2.80       divergence: 0.00
> FR missing: 530  different: 5    convergence: 17.70      divergence: 0.94
> ID missing: 644  different: 0    convergence: 0.00       divergence: 0.00
> IT missing: 486  different: 4    convergence: 24.53      divergence: 0.82
> JA missing: 192  different: 17   convergence: 70.19      divergence: 8.85
> KO missing: 614  different: 0    convergence: 4.66       divergence: 0.00
> LT missing: 644  different: 0    convergence: 0.00       divergence: 0.00
> NL missing: 611  different: 2    convergence: 5.12       divergence: 0.33
> PL missing: 614  different: 3    convergence: 4.66       divergence: 0.49
> PT missing: 586  different: 2    convergence: 9.01       divergence: 0.34
> RO missing: 398  different: 6    convergence: 38.20      divergence: 1.51
> RU missing: 594  different: 13   convergence: 7.76       divergence: 2.19
> SV missing: 642  different: 0    convergence: 0.31       divergence: 0.00
> TH missing: 643  different: 0    convergence: 0.16       divergence: 0.00
> TR missing: 634  different: 0    convergence: 1.55       divergence: 0.00
> UK missing: 559  different: 0    convergence: 13.20      divergence: 0.00
> ZH missing: 489  different: 2    convergence: 24.07      divergence: 0.41
> 
> Assuming that all links point to complete and well translated pages, the 
> best translation seems to be japanese one.
> I will look for ways to have a deeper and better comparison (suggestions 
> welcome).
> 
> of course maintaining a translation of such a beast of a wiki is tough, 
> but I feel that there is also not a great knowledge of the guidelines 
> (http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Meta:Guides/Translation_Guide) if 
> there are pages like:
> http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:EL/2.6/Manual/Game_Engine/Logic/%CE%91%CE%B9%CF%83%CE%B8%CE%B7%CF%84%CE%AE%CF%81%CE%B5%CF%82
> (and subpagers, and there are more in the greek translation :-D)
> 
> -- 
> *Marco
> *
> 
> 
> -------------------
> [Ai sensi e per  gli  effetti della Legge sulla tutela della privacy
> (L. 196/2003), questa  mail  ? destinata unicamente alle persone sopra
> indicate e le informazioni in essa contenute sono da considerarsi
> strettamente riservate. E' proibito leggere, copiare, usare o
> diffondere il contenuto della presente mail senza autorizzazione.
> Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per errore, siete pregati di
> rispedire la stessa al mittente. Grazie]
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20130930/ae2d12c8/attachment.html 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> 
> 
> End of Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 103, Issue 12
> ********************************************
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20131001/c3242dcb/attachment.htm 


More information about the Bf-docboard mailing list