[Bf-docboard] Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 106, Issue 11
Ivan Paulos Tomé
greylica at gmail.com
Fri Dec 27 12:39:24 CET 2013
Hi, in 2014 I will continue active. :)
If there is a possibility, we may have to discuss a bit about the
infrastructure of the blenderwiki, because we will need
more pages in certain areas.
I'm working in the technical part of the BTSC
project, and I have created another wiki for
Blender, here (In Portuguese):
http://wiki.blenderfarmbrasil.com.br/index.php/Doc:PT/2.6/Manual
Cheers !
Ivan Paulos T. (Greylica)
2013/12/27 <bf-docboard-request at blender.org>
> Send Bf-docboard mailing list submissions to
> bf-docboard at blender.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> bf-docboard-request at blender.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> bf-docboard-owner at blender.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Bf-docboard digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Hired documentation authors (Ton Roosendaal)
> 2. Re: Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 106, Issue 10 (Ivan Paulos Tom?)
> 3. Re: SSL for developer.blender.org (Dan McGrath)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:13:34 +0100
> From: Ton Roosendaal <ton at blender.org>
> Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] Hired documentation authors
> To: Blender Documentation Project <bf-docboard at blender.org>
> Message-ID: <2E9851B4-8993-42AA-88FA-564BF8B701BD at blender.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have to admit I'm not very active with monitoring all the activity on
> our wiki.
> It would be a good step to verify here who's active here now, and/or is
> planning to be active next year as well.
>
> Blender should remain in its core a community project, that's our real
> strength. Having a good and welcoming system for many people to contribute
> is always my preference. However, there's also a number of tasks here that
> might better be organized via freelancers who get paid for work. In the
> past I've done that for Luka and Francesco, for example.
>
> In September 2012, we had a similar discussion here, to appoint and
> empower a small admin board of 3 to 5 people. This team could be
> re-confirmed, and it's with them I can then discuss further matters for
> work on documentation as well.
>
> Back then in 2012, these were names listed:
>
> Admins:
> Kesten Broughton
> Brendon 'meta-androcto' Murphy
> Ivan 'greylica' Paulos Tom?
>
> I would like to propose to re-establish this team, based on activity on
> this list and in our wiki last year mostly. The 'admin' role is mostly to
> help coordinating and to decide on matters that help move things forwards :)
>
> Volunteers for the admin role can let me know here or in a private mail :)
>
> Feedback on this mail and proposal is welcome too!
>
> Regards,
>
> -Ton-
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Ton Roosendaal - ton at blender.org - www.blender.org
> Chairman Blender Foundation - Producer Blender Institute
> Entrepotdok 57A - 1018AD Amsterdam - The Netherlands
>
>
>
> On 25 Dec, 2013, at 14:09, nemyax wrote:
>
> > > nemyax says:
> > > More paid developers is always good, but have you considered hiring
> documentation writers?
> >
> > > ton says:
> > > Good point, also for code documentation writers? we have a mailing
> list for the wiki/docs team, there it can be discussed further. (See ?get
> involved? on blender.org)
> >
> > This short exchange happened a couple of days ago at
> http://code.blender.org/index.php/2013/12/plans-for-2014-2015/.
> > What would you say are the prospects of the Blender Foundation hiring
> writers?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-docboard mailing list
> > Bf-docboard at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:09:16 -0200
> From: Ivan Paulos Tom? <greylica at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 106, Issue 10
> To: bf-docboard at blender.org
> Message-ID:
> <
> CA+Zt8s6Y_OXtM8+81WrKamDqX1NWZvKx3tZjq8J94Us9QP562A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> It will be interesting to see how the community reacts about this proposal.
>
> ;)
>
> Ivan Paulos Tom?.
>
> 2013/12/26 <bf-docboard-request at blender.org>
>
> > Send Bf-docboard mailing list submissions to
> > bf-docboard at blender.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > bf-docboard-request at blender.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > bf-docboard-owner at blender.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Bf-docboard digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Hired documentation authors (nemyax)
> > 2. Re: Hired documentation authors (Nkansah Rexford)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:09:31 +0400
> > From: nemyax <nemyax at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [Bf-docboard] Hired documentation authors
> > To: bf-docboard at blender.org
> > Message-ID:
> > <
> > CADbKb9G_0_uEdBdWU1WA44hpyWSiQZ7KMCaY5eq2RxBCO+UCVA at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > > nemyax says:
> > > More paid developers is always good, but have you considered hiring
> > documentation writers?
> >
> > > ton says:
> > > Good point, also for code documentation writers? we have a mailing list
> > for the wiki/docs team, there it can be discussed further. (See ?get
> > involved? on blender.org)
> >
> > This short exchange happened a couple of days ago at
> > http://code.blender.org/index.php/2013/12/plans-for-2014-2015/.
> > What would you say are the prospects of the Blender Foundation hiring
> > writers?
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20131225/a875b007/attachment.html
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:13:48 +0000
> > From: Nkansah Rexford <nkansahrexford at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] Hired documentation authors
> > To: Blender Documentation Project <bf-docboard at blender.org>
> > Message-ID:
> > <CAKt11bXOQEC1Wf8Ch0AF3NBP4=
> > x-oWA2ADMO2yxaFYqZ+F30Ag at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> >
> > I thought currently, there are hired writers for the documentation. Or?
> >
> > Well, if not, I think it'll be good having that too.
> >
> > google.com/+Nkansahrexford | sent from Tab
> > On Dec 25, 2013 1:09 PM, "nemyax" <nemyax at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > nemyax says:
> > > > More paid developers is always good, but have you considered hiring
> > > documentation writers?
> > >
> > > > ton says:
> > > > Good point, also for code documentation writers? we have a mailing
> list
> > > for the wiki/docs team, there it can be discussed further. (See ?get
> > > involved? on blender.org)
> > >
> > > This short exchange happened a couple of days ago at
> > > http://code.blender.org/index.php/2013/12/plans-for-2014-2015/.
> > > What would you say are the prospects of the Blender Foundation hiring
> > > writers?
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bf-docboard mailing list
> > > Bf-docboard at blender.org
> > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> > >
> > >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20131225/3b6ea296/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-docboard mailing list
> > Bf-docboard at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
> >
> >
> > End of Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 106, Issue 10
> > ********************************************
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20131226/2e8322fa/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:36:23 -0500
> From: Dan McGrath <danmcgrath.ca at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] SSL for developer.blender.org
> To: bf-blender developers <bf-committers at blender.org>, Blender
> Documentation Project <bf-docboard at blender.org>
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAK82gMEfwvHTQmzYzkKrL+n8jwHL2MMUFkCs_a4soFQ4b0g2iQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hey,
>
> Ok, the (non EV yet) SSL cert has been installed and configured on
> https://git.blender.org which, although isn't forcing https (yet?) when
> browsing using gitweb, can be used to securely clone from using:
>
> git clone https://git.blender.org/blender.git
> cd blender
> git submodule update --init --recursive
> git submodule foreach git checkout master
> git submodule foreach git pull --rebase origin master
>
> There is a command to change the origin to be HTTPS instead of HTTP that
> doesn't require a new clone, but since I don't know this off the top of my
> head, here is what a fresh .git/config file looks like after doing all of
> the submodule checkouts and everything:
>
> [core]
> repositoryformatversion = 0
> filemode = true
> bare = false
> logallrefupdates = true
> [remote "origin"]
> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
> url = https://git.blender.org/blender.git
> [branch "master"]
> remote = origin
> merge = refs/heads/master
> [submodule "release/datafiles/locale"]
> url = https://git.blender.org/blender-translations.git
> [submodule "release/scripts/addons"]
> url = https://git.blender.org/blender-addons.git
> [submodule "release/scripts/addons_contrib"]
> url = https://git.blender.org/blender-addons-contrib.git
> [submodule "scons"]
> url = https://git.blender.org/scons.git
>
>
> Note that devs with commit access are probably pushing via ssh+git, which
> is already cryptographically secure, in which case you can probably figure
> out what to change on your own if you use alternate push/pull paths, etc..
>
> As for the docboard, you may want to update any of the wiki instructions to
> recommend HTTPS over HTTP, but I leave this for you to figure out.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Dan McGrath <danmcgrath.ca at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Ok, the new EV SSL cert is active now on developer.blender.org and
> should
> > always show up as a big green bar with the foundation's name in it
> followed
> > by the ISO country code. If it doesn't, someone is wrong! ;)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Dan McGrath <danmcgrath.ca at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Seasons greetings!
> >>
> >> Just a heads up that RoosenSanta grabbed us a shiny new SSL certificate
> >> from Comodo today for Developer (and Git, which isn't setup yet). I
> enabled
> >> forced SSL in Phabricator now which seems to work fine (thx to Sergey
> for
> >> doing the httpd setup).
> >>
> >> Just a heads up though that we got a free EV (extended validation) cert,
> >> but got a temporary cert (unless we choose to ignore EV) until all the
> >> paper work (ugh, Fax!) is filled out and submitted, so you can probably
> >> expect the cert to change in the coming days once more.
> >>
> >> Note to the devs that the .arcconfig file probably needs updating to
> >> HTTPS, although I would expect it to redirect, but not sure how test
> this.
> >>
> >> Finally, users may or may not want to change their password on
> >> Phabricator after the move to SSL. Also, merry Christmas and HNY! :D
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20131226/bc2de98f/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-docboard mailing list
> Bf-docboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard
>
>
> End of Bf-docboard Digest, Vol 106, Issue 11
> ********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-docboard/attachments/20131227/3b9cbbaa/attachment.htm
More information about the Bf-docboard
mailing list