[Uni-verse] Re: Audio demo situation?

[Gert Svensson]

Lauri,

see my comments below:

Lauri Savioja wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2006, Gert Svensson wrote:
>   
>> The goal I would like to achieve is to have an interior model which is 
>> visually nice (with some complex objects) and be able to
>>     
>
> We don't have such a model! It is urgently needed. Who is going to make that?
>   
MinusPlus supplies the model in Max. Mattias import it to Verse.
>
>
> The Max-part is under testing, and there are problems. As far as I
> know Mattias is working on this and Samuel is helping with testing. I
> think Mattias would be the best person to describe the situation in
> more detail, if required.
>   
This is also my view.
>
>   
>> 3) Material database Works but more materials may be needed
>>     
>
> It seems that there has been some confusion. I thought that Max will
> load the material database, but it seems that I've been mistaken. We
> will make a vml-database of acoustic materials and load it to the
> Verse server to overcome this problem.
>   
This makes me confused as well: Max assigns material names. The database 
module Emil wrote reads the material names and insert material 
properties in the server
form the list of material names and properties stored in "the database". 
Emil can correct me if I'm wrong here. What more is needed?
>   
>   
>> 5) Rendering Have you tested the latest FHG renderer on the web site? 
>> Have you tested Quel Solaar on your HW?
>>     
>
> No.
>
> Quel Solaar works in Windows. Linux version hasn't been tested
> lately, but at least several months ago we didn't succeed in
> compiling it.
>   
Please test both of them!

>> What is the situation with the design of the audio house? Have you 
>> rented material to build it? Will it be covered or open?
>>     
>
> The frame is rented from the Fair Center, and they will install and
> unistall it for us. The room will be covered by curtains on three
> walls (Tapio, please, correct me if I'm wrong)
>   
Sounds great!
>   
>> Would it be need of some discussion (IRC or phone) to prepare for next week?
>>     
>
> I think we can make it by e-mail if you have good answers to the open
> questions, most importantly a new model is needed.
>   
OK

Best Regards
Ger