[Bf-python] RVKs

Joseph Gilbert jgilbert at TIGR.org
Thu Sep 22 22:25:56 CEST 2005


O gee thx for taking the wind out of my sails :) j/k lol This is good to 
know matt. I guess we need to move NLA to Blender.NLA (or 
Blender.Action) then.

Matt Ebb wrote:

>
> On 22/09/2005, at 17:42 PM, Joseph Gilbert wrote:
>
>> It makes sense to put NLA under Blender.Armature if your thinking of 
>> functional groupings. NLA wraps Actions which defines an Armature's 
>> animations. NLA applies to armatures - it does not apply to other 
>> objects. This is the reason it's here rather than Blender.NLA or 
>> Blender.Object.NLA.
>
>
> According to Ton, this (hopefully) won't be the case for much longer. 
> The plan is to eventually make Actions generic containers for any Ipos 
> and not just Armature Ipos so that other things than Armatures can be 
> used in NLA, controlled by Action constraints, etc.
>
> Matt
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bf-python mailing list
>Bf-python at projects.blender.org
>http://projects.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-python
>  
>




More information about the Bf-python mailing list