[Bf-python] "Lamp.col": it's a bug?

Willian Padovani Germano wgermano at ig.com.br
Tue May 20 06:05:46 CEST 2003


Hi, Manuel

On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 18:59, Manuel wrote:
> About the attribute "Lamp.col".
(...)
> It's a bug, or the "col" attribute will be removed to use the
> "classic" R G B attributes?

You're right, .col is not there and probably it never was.  .R, .G, .B
are there, as you said.

I haven't put .col in the new (exppython) implementation of Lamp yet for
that very reason.  It wouldn't be hard to add it, but I want to check
some other things first (aka: there's more than one way to do it).  Not
having it, though, keeps the code simpler and the API more compact.

In other words, it's not decided yet.

BTW:  You are the main programmer behind Make Human, right?  That
project is great : ).

We'd like to know your opinions (and of other script writers, of course)
about the current 2.25 API (used in Blender 2.25 to 2.27 and +-
documented at that 2.25 API doc).  What is bad? What makes your work
harder?  What isn't working well?  Do you prefer Mesh or NMesh?

--
Willian, wgermano at ig.com.br




More information about the Bf-python mailing list