[Bf-interface] A branch for experimental UI dev

Julian Eisel eiseljulian at gmail.com
Sun May 10 17:29:19 CEST 2015


Was already wondering, but indeed forgot to set some SCons parameters
:S Fixed in latest head.

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Sean Olson <seanolson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jonathan, I know both Julien and Antonis both use cmake - scons gets updated
> when I complain, but it's more often broken.
>
> -Sean
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Jonathan Williamson <jonathan at cgcookie.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Julien! I attempted to build the UI branch the other day and it
>> failed. I will try again shortly and let you know. I'm eager to test the
>> User Preferences tabs.
>>
>> Jonathan Williamson
>> http://cgcookie.com
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Julian Eisel <eiseljulian at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alright, I set up the basic wiki page
>>>
>>> (http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Doc/Projects/UI/UI_experiments_branch)
>>> and linked to it from the UI Projects page.
>>>
>>> I'd propose that UI-team owners and devs are allowed to invite people
>>> to use the branch. Of course designers can do that as well after
>>> checking with a dev/owner (I added an invitation template to the
>>> branch's wiki page - not mandatory, just for laziness ;) ). I think
>>> this way we can keep things organized.
>>>
>>> @Pawel, sounds good, feel free to send the first invitation :)
>>>
>>> The branch is currently equal to latest master, so everything should
>>> be ready now. Let's start playing!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Julian -
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Jonathan Williamson
>>> <jonathan at cgcookie.com> wrote:
>>> > This is good. Thanks for setting it up Julian!
>>> >
>>> > Jonathan Williamson
>>> > http://cgcookie.com
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Diego Gangl <dnicolas at gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hey \o
>>> >>
>>> >> What would be the workflow for this? do we post patches and the team
>>> >> votes on them (and then you commit them)?
>>> >>
>>> >> also, +1 for addon icons
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >>
>>> >> 2015-04-14 16:27 GMT-03:00 Paweł Łyczkowski
>>> >> <pawellyczkowski at gmail.com>:
>>> >> > Awesome.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Could be a good opportunity to revive "Icons for Add-ons"
>>> >> > development.
>>> >> > Here
>>> >> > it is: https://developer.blender.org/D645
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Julian Eisel wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hey guys!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Today I set up a new branch 'UI-experiments'
>>> >> > (https://developer.blender.org/diffusion/B/browse/UI-experiments/)
>>> >> > so
>>> >> > we finally have a place where we can test and develop features
>>> >> > without
>>> >> > having to worry about anything (well almost), it's our personal
>>> >> > playground. I talked about it with Pablo last week and we decided to
>>> >> > give it a go.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The only three rules I propose:
>>> >> > - No features from which we know they won't end up in master (rather
>>> >> > soonish). The purpose of this branch is to develop features towards
>>> >> > master (this also includes testing). If we don't see someone working
>>> >> > on a feature for a some months, and we can't see the will to do s o,
>>> >> > we
>>> >> > simply kick the feature out
>>> >> > - Features that go in must have an own up-to-date branch (local or
>>> >> > remote) to make the final merge with master easier. This is in the
>>> >> > hands of the developer of the feature - he has to prepare the
>>> >> > feature
>>> >> > for final merge, which can be difficult and annoying if you need to
>>> >> > do
>>> >> > it from a branch that is really diverged from master
>>> >> > - All added features and the people involved must be listed
>>> >> > somewhere
>>> >> > so we can keep track of them easily (wiki page?)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I can take care of the branch by making sure it stays up-to-date
>>> >> > with
>>> >> > master and builds fine (and maybe we can create testbuilds on and
>>> >> > off).
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Curious to hear feedback and to get this running. If we got
>>> >> > everything
>>> >> > organized we can start bombing the branch with features :)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Cheers,
>>> >> > - Julian -
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > Bf-interface mailing list
>>> >> > Bf-interface at blender.org
>>> >> > http://lists.blender.org/mai lman/listinfo/bf-interface
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > Bf-interface mailing list
>>> >> > Bf-interface at blender.org
>>> >> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-interface
>>> >> >
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Bf-interface mailing list
>>> >> Bf-interface at blender.org
>>> >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-interface
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Bf-interface mailing list
>>> > Bf-interface at blender.org
>>> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-interface
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bf-interface mailing list
>>> Bf-interface at blender.org
>>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-interface
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-interface mailing list
>> Bf-interface at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-interface
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ||------------------ Instant Messengers ----------------------
> ||                     ICQ at 11133295
> ||                 AIM at shatterstar98
> ||  MSN Messenger at shatter98 at hotmail.com
> ||              Yahoo Y! at the_7th_samuri
> ||----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-interface mailing list
> Bf-interface at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-interface
>


More information about the Bf-interface mailing list