[Bf-funboard] Reasoning behind child - parent coordinates

Jeffrey italic.rendezvous at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 17:06:23 CEST 2015


I like this idea. Maybe even a checkbox in the relation properties?

Gatis, could I perhaps get a copy of your parent script to play with? 
I'm not one with the Python interpreter yet.

On 04/20/2015 02:36 AM, Gatis Kurzemnieks wrote:
> How about adding a new parenting method like 'Make Parent without Inverse'
> but one that keeps the child objects offset from parents center and sets it
> to local transform of the child? Basically - a standard parenting operation
> like in other software. It's just quite hard to reproduce this behavior now
> without such command.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:14 AM Alberto Torres <kungfoobar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Campbell Barton <ideasman42 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> @Alberto Torres, quite sure all values relating to parent/child
>>> relationship are accessible via Python. we only miss utility functions
>>> to easily access them.
>>>
>>
>> I calculated them using the local and world matrices of the object and the
>> parent. Is there a better way?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-funboard mailing list
>> Bf-funboard at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-funboard mailing list
> Bf-funboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard

-- 
Jeffrey "Italic_" Hoover



More information about the Bf-funboard mailing list