[Bf-funboard] additional proportional edit mode? Connected project 2D

Hadrien Brissaud hadriscus at gmail.com
Tue Sep 3 12:36:57 CEST 2013


In my opinion there really needs to be a redesign of the proportional
editing; I had suggested a new behaviour a while ago and others have given
it some thoughts, too. I'll try to mockup something.


On 3 September 2013 10:58, Bol Bib <bollebib at hotmail.com> wrote:

> for example when I work on a character where the shoes,hands,hair,clothes
> are in the same object ,but not connected.
>
> if I want to modify the hand with projected 2D I also accidentily move the
> arm and parts of the torso. Same for feet or hair and head. Connected mode
> can be fine in lots of cases,but the projected 2D has different rules that
> sometimes work better for the task at hand.
>
> Hiding is then the only option, to work with projected 2D . But you
> sometimes need for those polygons that can't be adjusted to be visible to
> tweak them according to each other. For example fit a hand better in a
> sleeve, or a vest to a neck.
>
> Also hiding,unhiding everytime slows work down considerably. A connected
> projected 2D would  give me the handy projected 2D but in a more
> controllable,seperated way while seeing the results of tweaks fully.
>
> I can think of plenty of times during modeling where I could have used
> that in stead of the normal projected 2D. Connected just doesn't cut it in
> those cases.
>
> is it more clear now?
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:26:52 +1000
> > From: ideasman42 at gmail.com
> > To: bf-funboard at blender.org
> > Subject: Re: [Bf-funboard] additional proportional edit mode? Connected
> project 2D
> >
> > While testing 'projected (2D)' option, I tried 'connected+projected
> > (2D)' and I couldn't find a good use for it.
> >
> > Could you show an example when this would be handy?
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Bol Bib <bollebib at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > I love the new "projected (2D)" proportional edit mode. But I find
> myself having to return to "connected" far more often then I would want,or
> hiding/unhhiding vertices much more then before, even when I need to see
> the result immediatly.
> > >
> > > I would propose  a "Connected project (2D)"  This would only influence
> the connected vertices but in the new projected manner. This would give us
> more control about what projected 2D actually influences.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bf-funboard mailing list
> > > Bf-funboard at blender.org
> > > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > - Campbell
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-funboard mailing list
> > Bf-funboard at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-funboard mailing list
> Bf-funboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
>


More information about the Bf-funboard mailing list