[Bf-funboard] Physical Memory and Cycles

[L. S.]

Hi, I think there are a few things that you aren't quite understanding. A lot of high
ratings on Microsoft's index won't guarantee that everything works super fast in
Blender. One bottleneck can bring everything down to a crawl. I think that in most
cases the RAM on your computer will not be the bottleneck.
Having a lot of RAM can be helpful, but suppose you have 4GB of RAM on your
computer, and your .blend only uses up 1GB of space. More RAM will not help or
"mean more processes," because there is nothing else to be stored. So far as I know,
there is no way that you "incorporate" system RAM with a graphics card, so more
RAM will not help that either.
I don't know enough about programming to say what makes it difficult to support
other cards (like AMD), only that there is a bug in the AMD driver which prevents
Cycles from using AMD cards correctly.
I suppose most gaming companies have supported both AMD and Nvidia cards for
years, but most gaming companies do not use Cycles. Most do not need the same
feature set that Cycles does, because they are creating graphics for games which
will not use, say, physically accurate ray-traced glass.
I would suggest doing what Mr. Knapp suggested, and use the features Cycles
has to improve render times. For example, use tiles, strategic sampling (including
the non-progressive mode features) to avoid unnecessary samples, and lower the
numbers of bounces.

I hope this helps!
-LswaN

> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 02:03:10 +0800
> From: lun3rcry at gmail.com
> To: bf-funboard at blender.org
> Subject: Re: [Bf-funboard] Physical Memory and Cycles
> 
> Thing is, according the windows experience index for my computer graphics,
> cpu, ram and graphics/corporate/gaming rendering my system scores 7's and
> up for all of these, which means cycles should not render nearly as slowly
> as it does for me.  But surely incorporating the ram means more processes
> are possible due to more being stored in memory while rendering?  I know it
> seems intel and AMD don't seem to support Blender, but what is difficult
> about making Blender use the GPU of different cards?  Haven't most gaming
> companies being doing this for years?
> 
> Ryan
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Knapp <magick.crow at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Nkansah Rexford
> > <nkansahrexford at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > @Knapp. For me, yes, have researched everywhere for speeding cycles. But
> > > the issue from Ryan has to do with, Can RAM supplement GPU for rendering
> > if
> > > one doesn't have nvidia for cycles?
> > >
> > > It isn't possible now, but can it be done?
> > >
> > > I believe if its possible and done, it can go a long way to close the gab
> > > between cycles and people like myself.
> > >
> > > AMD and Intel i guess aren't making any plans of supporting Blender soon
> > (I
> > > stand to be corrected though)
> > >
> > > rex
> >
> > You have to understand programming. Memory only helps if it can be
> > used for something that speeds up the calculations. For example if you
> > are working a big database and you want to sort it, then you can load
> > it all into memory and sort it, if you have enough ram to hold all the
> > date or a way to sort big chunks in memory. This is way faster than
> > moving records around on the hard drive one by one.
> >
> > I don't know how cycles really works but it is ray traced, I think.
> > This means that you have a vector or ray that bounces around from
> > camera surface to the light and you calculate the color based on this
> > ray. Problem is that you have to do this for every ray and that means
> > a LOT of them. Ram does not help this. Having a cpu for each ray does.
> > Thus a CPU with 12 cores is good but a GPU with 1000 is WAY better and
> > you see this in the test results.
> >
> > Other factors are how much ram you system has for holding the .blend
> > and also how much the GPU has for hold the model.  Also the pipe size
> > between the ram and the GPU or CPU and the speed of the CPU/GPU.
> >
> > Devs please correct me, if I am wrong or point out things I missed.
> >
> > --
> > Douglas E Knapp
> >
> > Creative Commons Film Group, Helping people make open source movies
> > with open source software!
> > http://douglas.bespin.org/CommonsFilmGroup/phpBB3/index.php
> >
> > Massage in Gelsenkirchen-Buer:
> > http://douglas.bespin.org/tcm/ztab1.htm
> > Please link to me and trade links with me!
> >
> > Open Source Sci-Fi mmoRPG Game project.
> > http://sf-journey-creations.wikispot.org/Front_Page
> > http://code.google.com/p/perspectiveproject/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bf-funboard mailing list
> > Bf-funboard at blender.org
> > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> They say the extractor can be.. a little disconcerting to the thought
> process..I'd uh.. offer you a couple of Aspirin but snigger, I'm not
> authorised to prescribe medication hah hah hah! Think good thoughts!
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-funboard mailing list
> Bf-funboard at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard