[Bf-funboard] Next steps!
Jean Montambeault
bf-funboard@blender.org
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:29:38 -0400
Ton Roosendaal wrote:
> 2.0 Anyone who's interested in actively reviewing proposals, can
> apply as a Member in the 'bf-funboard' project at the site. This
> allows some moderation features, defined by the project admins. To
> prevent too much 'noise' at this project, we'll require endorsement
> of at least one other Member to get in.
Errr... I'm already a member here so I guess that it's not what you mean
by 'Member'. You probably mean 'member of a reviewing board'... and the
endorsing Member would also be on that board ? So somebody would have to
be sort of an Original Member (I feel like I am some kind of Free Mason
;D ) on whom the responsibility for the first 'approvals' would rest ?
Or what ? This is confusing.
There are subjects on which I have little to say and yet what I have to
say may be important. What if somewhere along that contrived process I
don't get in ? For example I don't want to have the parenting/grouping
conveniences 'replaced' by constraints. Parenting and constraints are
two entirely different concepts, the former relating to hierachical
organization, the later relating to the definition of an object
properties.... blah blah blah
This is important, yet I need to be sponsorized to get a chance to say
it ? What's that ?
Jean