[Bf-funboard] Policy

[Ton Roosendaal]

Hi,

It is just a practical consideration. I don't give up, but we depend on  
the people who'll actively support it.

SUGGESTION:

Please let's first gather all topics here, with short descriptions, and  
allow Matt to collect all of it, and put that together in a nice  
doc/diagram. We then can look at how we'll tackle all of it.
If we already start the debates it will end in too much chaos.

Only exceptions would be projects coders only work at, and need  
immediate feedback on.

Thanks!

-Ton-


On Sunday, Jun 15, 2003, at 14:29 Europe/Amsterdam, Mateusz Gorecki  
wrote:

>> -- Decision on Game Engine & players
>> Although I really *love* the concept of a fully integrated 3d suite,
>> the game engine in Blender brings a load of complex issues:
>> - it doesn't integrate too well (code is nicely separated, works fine
>> for coders, but limits its functionality)
>> - If you check the old NaN bug tracker, you'll find 80% of the  
>> reported
>> bugs is in the Game engine, or its lack of integration with Blender.
>> - the Web plug-in player is a HELL of a project to build & maintain.
>
> Hey Ton!Your plans to upgrade Blender are greate!
> But i would really please you to not give up the web plugin
> and game engine. I think it will have really big future. Web based  
> games and
> so on.
> It can be the flash & shockwave of the future! Keep workin' on it! =)
> cya!
> Mateusz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-funboard mailing list
> Bf-funboard@blender.org
> http://www.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-funboard
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
--
Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation ton@blender.org  
http://www.blender.org