[Bf-education] Bf-education Digest, Vol 74, Issue 25
Ton Roosendaal
ton at blender.org
Tue Dec 20 20:41:59 CET 2011
Hi Kesten,
On 20 Dec, 2011, at 20:15, Kesten Broughton wrote:
> Many certifying bodies (for example NABCEP which certifies solar
> training in north america) don't actually set the exams. They just
> set the standards and allow other organizations to submit their
> exams for acceptance as a certifying exam.
>
> This has the advantage that existing programs like the one at MIT
> wouldn't have to waste their work done in setting their exam; and it
> allows more flexibility for different teaching styles, emphasis etc.
>
> I think it would be great to have this group set some sample exams
> but leave the door open for other groups to have their exams
> approved as well.
And it saves us from a lot of adminstration overhead :)
> ps. Could people remember to delete the existing text when they hit
> the "reply" button, or uncheck the "include original text" box. It
> makes scrolling through the conversations much easier.
I plead the opposite. Each mail should to store its own clear history,
so people understand what it is about. You might use a mail client
that puts stuff together based on some rules... not everyone uses that
though, nor does it always make sense.
-Ton-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ton Roosendaal Blender Foundation ton at blender.org www.blender.org
Blender Institute Entrepotdok 57A 1018AD Amsterdam The Netherlands
More information about the Bf-education
mailing list