[Bf-education] Bf-education Digest, Vol 74, Issue 25

Ton Roosendaal ton at blender.org
Tue Dec 20 20:41:59 CET 2011


Hi Kesten,


On 20 Dec, 2011, at 20:15, Kesten Broughton wrote:

> Many certifying bodies (for example NABCEP which certifies solar  
> training in north america) don't actually set the exams.  They just  
> set the standards and allow other organizations to submit their  
> exams for acceptance as a certifying exam.
>
> This has the advantage that existing programs like the one at MIT  
> wouldn't have to waste their work done in setting their exam; and it  
> allows more flexibility for different teaching styles, emphasis etc.
>
> I think it would be great to have this group set some sample exams  
> but leave the door open for other groups to have their exams  
> approved as well.

And it saves us from a lot of adminstration overhead :)

> ps.  Could people remember to delete the existing text when they hit  
> the "reply" button, or uncheck the "include original text" box.  It  
> makes scrolling through the conversations much easier.

I plead the opposite. Each mail should to store its own clear history,  
so people understand what it is about. You might use a mail client  
that puts stuff together based on some rules... not everyone uses that  
though, nor does it always make sense.

-Ton-

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ton Roosendaal  Blender Foundation   ton at blender.org    www.blender.org
Blender Institute   Entrepotdok 57A  1018AD Amsterdam   The Netherlands




More information about the Bf-education mailing list