[Bf-docboard] Script Licensing

[Matt Ebb]

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:53 AM, joe <joeedh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hrm.  You could try contacting some admins.  We went with OCL because the
> manual is OCL, and it seemed to make sense (as back then the wiki was
> primarily for user documentation/developer documents).

Right, it was all about the old 2.3 manual, which was OCL. Anyway, is
there any reason at all why the contents of the entire wiki must be
licensed the same? Why not just state: 'open content, unless otherwise
stated on the page itself' or even something more restrictive like:
'open content, unless otherwise declared as GPL on the page itself' or
'open content, with the exception of GPL for all contained
program/script code'

Matt