[Bf-docboard] Back!

[Kenneth Styrberg]

Hi!

>2 - The2.3 guide was printed by professional typesetter which did *not* use
>the XMLs (Nor the PDF)
>  
>
I hope they at least used the text! :)

>3 - We definitely need roles, I'll try to bring up a table of peope willing
>todo something, please spechify what you would like to do but plese remember
>that we don't need *only* tutorials, but also reference material.
>
>  
>
OK!

>I'm slightly in favour of MediaWiki, but we can indeed stay with docbook. In
>both case I need to appoint some (trusted) people as responsibles of
>different doc parts. In the DocBook case we need someone writing a decent
>CSS and a slender way to upload HTML for browsing and downloading.
>
>Stefano
>
>  
>
I played a bit with wiki at  
http://www.vrotvrot.com/blenderwiki/index.php/FileBrowser_Window , but I 
think it's more difficult, (more work), to create new documents with 
pictures online than with docbook (= offline). There are some pros and 
cons on both ways.

I also tried to use OpenOffice with a master document and all chapters 
as sub documents. It works but there are some things that needs to 
improve when working like this. I saw Olivier used OO when he wrote his 
docs. The good thing with OO is that exporting to HTML and PDF works 
very well. (at least the parts I tested). And OO is cross platform.


Regards

Kenneth