[Bf-docboard] particle system

[Jason Oppel]

Hmmmm...  "Special Effects" sounds a bit more descriptive to me.  Perhaps i=
ts being a little picky but I think its slightly more clear.  What do you=
 guys think?

-Jason <Pato>

-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Findeiss <droddl@gmx.de>
To: bf-docboard@blender.org
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:22:13 +0100 (MET)=20
Subject: Re: [Bf-docboard] particle system

>=20
> > A separate chapter sounds good to me.
>=20
> Separate Chapter sonds good, yes... but don't title it 'Particles' title
> it
> 'Effects' and subdivide it into 3 sections 'Build', 'Particles' and
> 'Wave'.

Maybe that's the best idea. And if the particle system gets replaced
somewhen in the far future ;-) then it will be easier to rewrite ant includ=
e it into
the doc!
=20
> If you don't want to write the other two section (which are incredibly
> less
> vast than particles) then someone else will surely do!

I'm not really into these sections, but I surely will learn.

@Bart: Can I start writing the Particle, sorry EFFECTS Chapter, from scratc=
h
into one docbook file like all others, and you include it into the whole
document, when it is finished?
I think I write some kind of framework, to have something online, OK?

Let's get to work. Something harder now! ;-) Hopefully I can manage it. ;-)

cya Flo


-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f=C3=BCr 1 ct/ Min. surfen!

_______________________________________________
Bf-docboard mailing list
Bf-docboard@blender.org
http://www.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-docboard