[Bf-cycles] Updated standalone repository

[Stefan Werner]

Hi Thomas,

the requirements for the current version of Cycles standalone are the same as for Blender 2.92. If you don't require buliding your own libraries, the binaries from https://svn.blender.org/svnroot/bf-blender/tags/blender-2.92-release/lib/win64_vc15 work just fine.

-Stefan
________________________________
From: Bf-cycles <bf-cycles-bounces at blender.org> on behalf of thomas <thomas.krebs at mecadtron.de>
Sent: March 2, 2021 10:24 AM
To: bf-cycles at blender.org <bf-cycles at blender.org>
Subject: Re: [Bf-cycles] Updated standalone repository

Hi,

Apparently there are so many changes that the old environment doesn't
work any more to compile Cycles.
Can somebody outline which libraries in which version are now necessary
to compile Cycles, especially on Windows?

Thomas

Am 28.02.2021 um 22:14 schrieb Stefan Werner:
> Hi,
>
> as announced in the Blender Rendering Meeting, I have updated the Cycles repository to reflect Blender 2.92. An additional branch was created that will be kept in sync with Blender 2.83 LTS. I have also added tags that mark the sync points for the last few Blender releases (blender-v2.83.12, blender-v2.90.1, blender-v2.91.2, blender-v2.92.0). I did not tag a new Cycles version.
>
> Please report any issues (and if you can, provide a patch) that you encounter as a result of this merge. I have not tested all possible permutations of build platforms and options.
>
> -Stefan
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>
_______________________________________________
Bf-cycles mailing list
Bf-cycles at blender.org
https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20210305/687f3605/attachment.htm>