[Bf-cycles] Rendering Mask - render only selected pixels.

Mohamed Sakr 3dsakr at gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 21:35:23 CEST 2016


I would go for a mask in front of the camera with mix shader, mix inputs
are hold out and transparent, mix factor is your texture.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Tobiasz Karoń <unfa00 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I wish I could tell Cycles which pixels to render using a Mask or bitmap -
> where render Border is insufficient (and can't be animated, or loaded from
> a texture).
>
> I'm working on a system to turn 2D projects into 3D visuals automatically.
> If I could re-render only the pixels that are really needed I could save a
> lot of rendering time and greatly increase the systems performance.
>
> I have a lot of little things that change accoring to a texture that is
> generated from a user's design. But a lot of the image is the same - so why
> rednder it all, while I can load it back form an image file to and alpha
> over only what is really chaning form project to project?
>
> I can't fake this with holdout materials (to make Cycles render nothing -
> saving time, becasue that redners very fast, because I need to have
> refelction between static and dynamic objects - and holdout would block
> these.
>
> Hmm - maybe I could use a mask in front of the camera using holdout but
> only for camera rays, letting the rest to render?
>
> What do you think? Would such a feature we of good use, or maybe it's a
> waste of time and can be worked around?
>
> --
> - Tobiasz 'unfa' Karoń
>
> http://soundcloud.com/unfa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20160923/3f0a4c65/attachment.htm 


More information about the Bf-cycles mailing list