[Bf-cycles] Why is the rolling shutter duration hard-clamped to <1?

[gandalf3]

Ah, I see. Thanks
Perhaps instead of "Rolling Shutter Duration", "Rolling Shutter Factor" 
would be a better name?

On 03/12/2016 04:53 AM, Sergey Sharybin wrote:
> You can think of Rolling Shutter Duration as a factor which defines 
> how much motion blur and how much rolling shutter effect you'll get in 
> the frame. Rolling shutter duration of 0 means there's no rolling 
> shutter effect at all, and rolling shutter duration of 1 means there's 
> only a rolling shutter effect in the frame.
>
> Amount of how much curved objects are with the rolling shutter is 
> controlled by Shutter Time parameter.
>
> That being said, instead of using rolling shutter duration above 1 you 
> should be increasing shutter time.
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:37 AM, gandalf3 <zzyxpaw at gmail.com 
> <mailto:zzyxpaw at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Why is the Rolling Shutter Duration setting hard limited to less
>     than 1?
>     I tried removing the limit in
>     /blender/intern/cycles/blender/addon/properties.py:554 and it appeared
>     to work more or less as expected (but perhaps blurrier than I would've
>     thought?)
>
>     Is there a rational behind this limitation?
>     _______________________________________________
>     Bf-cycles mailing list
>     Bf-cycles at blender.org <mailto:Bf-cycles at blender.org>
>     http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20160312/42dab5bc/attachment.htm