[Bf-cycles] Time rendering
matt.heimlich at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 16:20:46 CET 2016
It's likely that won't be a 2 hour test on your end, that CPU in the
original post is ancient.
On Jan 25, 2016 3:15 AM, "Sergey Sharybin" <sergey.vfx at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh wow, first ever report about Windows builds being faster than Linux
> ones. That's a good start of the day.
> In any case, it's not that much we can do with only timing information. We
> have to be able to reproduce the issue ourselves in order to investigate
> it, so regular bug report guidelines applies:
> - Provide as much simple .blend file as possible which still indicates the
> problem (2hrs render is not really good showcase)
> - Provide system information (Help -> System Info in Blender (having both
> Windows and Linux system infos will be handy))
> Also please check you aren't using some power/performance policy on Linux
> -- if it lowers CPU frequency down to lower power consumption we can't do
> much form Blender side.
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Andrei Shaitar <webdisweb at gmail.com>
>> I make a small test.
>> I render a still image on the laptop using the CPU to different
>> operating systems. Here are the results.
>> WIN XP 32bit - 1:53:20.27
>> Ubuntu studio 32bit - 4:25:28.51
>> Ubuntu studio 64bit - 2:24:36.17
>> I use a Blender 2.76b, Cycles.
>> CPU Pentium Dual Core T4400
>> RAM 4 Gb
>> It wants to work on Linux, but this time difference is alarming.
>> Thank you!
>> Bf-cycles mailing list
>> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bf-cycles