[Bf-cycles] Time rendering

[Matthew Heimlich]

It's likely that won't be a 2 hour test on your end, that CPU in the
original post is ancient.
On Jan 25, 2016 3:15 AM, "Sergey Sharybin" <sergey.vfx at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh wow, first ever report about Windows builds being faster than Linux
> ones. That's a good start of the day.
>
> In any case, it's not that much we can do with only timing information. We
> have to be able to reproduce the issue ourselves in order to investigate
> it, so regular bug report guidelines applies:
>
> - Provide as much simple .blend file as possible which still indicates the
> problem (2hrs render is not really good showcase)
> - Provide system information (Help -> System Info in Blender (having both
> Windows and Linux system infos will be handy))
>
> Also please check you aren't using some power/performance policy on Linux
> -- if it lowers CPU frequency down to lower power consumption we can't do
> much form Blender side.
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Andrei Shaitar <webdisweb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>> I make a small test.
>> I render a still image on the laptop using the CPU to different
>> operating systems. Here are the results.
>>
>>
>> WIN XP 32bit - 1:53:20.27
>> Ubuntu studio 32bit - 4:25:28.51
>> Ubuntu studio 64bit - 2:24:36.17
>>
>> I use a Blender  2.76b, Cycles.
>> CPU Pentium Dual Core T4400
>> RAM 4 Gb
>>
>> It wants to work on Linux, but this time difference is alarming.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-cycles mailing list
>> Bf-cycles at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Sergey Sharybin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20160125/8abf3816/attachment.htm