[Bf-cycles] Cycles as Default Engine

[Jonathan Williamson]

I also completely agree. BI is still there and available for people that
need and or have certain requirements. But I don't believe those
requirements apply to the mass majority of users, at least not initially.
Just look at any gallery, the majority of images are submitted are rendered
with Cycles now. Those that are not tend to be by advanced artists that
have specific needs (such as NPR, motion graphics, etc).

Jonathan Williamson
http://cgcookie.com


On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Agustin Benavidez <
agustinbenavidez at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, defining feature complete could be tricky, Cycles could lack of Env
> light on shadows but BI lacks of global illumination, I seriously think
> global illumination is quite more relevant when we are enumerating features
> and which one is more important to most users.
>
>
>
> 2014-06-19 17:05 GMT-03:00 Nazim Mer <nazim.mer at gmail.com>:
>
>> +1 to cycles as defualts
>>
>> BUT i still think BI should always be in blender especially since it has
>> no affect on blenders ovveral performance......
>>
>> And its great for those quick renders especially when combined with
>> cycles baking
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Nazim Mer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-cycles mailing list
>> Bf-cycles at blender.org
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20140619/5ddd70ae/attachment.htm