[Bf-cycles] Cycles 2.64 GPU 2X slower???
Adriano Oliveira
adriano.ufrb at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 01:44:43 CEST 2012
Try seting tiles to 1x1.
In my experiences, the default 8x8 works best for CPU.
Adriano A. Oliveira
2012/10/23 Cal McGaugh <cal at cal3d.com>
> **
> Hi,
>
>
> using this benchmark<http://benchmark.cd3dtech.com/Benchmark/benchmark.html>,
> Cycles 2.64 r51291-mingw64 renders in 14min 22sec
>
> Cycles 2.64 2.64.5 "Fastest build (All CUDA kernels) renders in 14min
> 58sec.
>
> *But 2.63 r46461:46487M renders in 6min 22sec* .........what's up???
>
> Just thought someone should know about it.
>
> Cheers,
> Cal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20121023/7a0e92ee/attachment.htm
More information about the Bf-cycles
mailing list