[Bf-cycles] math node limits

Daniel Salazar - 3Developer.com zanqdo at gmail.com
Wed Mar 28 03:42:52 CEST 2012

That's what Im asking, if I can go ahead and add much higher hard limits
while keeping soft limits like they are. Not sure if there's a real
technical reason not to do this


Daniel Salazar

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Ben Dansie <bendansie at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  Hypothetical - is there a main advantage to having one node with a
> massive range as opposed to two or three math nodes? Other than the obvious
> simplicity of having one node. -100 to 100 sounds sensible to me if one has
> to cap it somewhere. If it isn't capped then I can imagine all sorts of
> accidental craziness from sliding values too far.
> However, as a solution to satisfy both options - something like the
> 'normal' input in Blender Internal texture panel. It is limited as a slider
> from a value of -5 to 5, but if you need to enter a value that is over 9000
> or whatever then the user can simply type it in and the cap is over-ridden.
> Hopefully I haven't just reported a bug, because I like that option from
> time to time.
> ------------------------------
> From: zanqdo at gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:03:36 -0600
> To: bf-cycles at blender.org
> Subject: [Bf-cycles] math node limits
> Just noticed the math node in cycles is limmited to a range of -100 to
> 100. Can we increase this WAY higher?
> cheers!
> Daniel Salazar
> patazstudio.com
> _______________________________________________ Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-cycles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-cycles/attachments/20120327/4e841407/attachment.htm 

More information about the Bf-cycles mailing list