[Bf-cycles] Switch to CUDA Toolkit 4.2 (Test 2)
db4tech at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Apr 30 20:39:43 CEST 2012
*Test 2: (just the GTX 460)*
19 Billions of Polygons, not a ridiculous number anymore - Island
*Official Blender 263*
*Blender 263.1 CUDA 4.2.9 test version*
Very slow with new CUDA Toolkit plus same graphical glitches as before
with certain trees. Is it possible CUDA Toolkit 4.2.9 is not backwards
compatible, designed just for GTX 680 cards and above? Guess we now
need someone with a GTX 680 to test your build, been wondering about
getting one due to lower temps and power usage, but still on the fence
until know rendering works correctly.
On 30/04/2012 18:32, David Black wrote:
> Hey Thomas,
> Thank you for the download link. Here are my findings so far...
> Mike Pan BMW test scene: Tried several times, re-rendering same scene
> plus closing and opening Blender to being rendering, no crashes on
> either GTX 460 or GTX 580M, render begins almost instantly thanks to
> Brecht's amazing optimized BVH building.
> Render times for CUDA Toolkit 4.2.9:
> *GTX 460
> *GTX 580M
> Can render almost a second faster if use the GTX 580M to run Blender
> interface but then interface becomes too sluggish during long GPU
> rendering, regrettably /(as you previously mentioned)/ using
> integrated Intel graphics to run Blender interface means no Viewport
> GPU rendering. Why does Viewport GPU rendering work using a 9600 GT
> for display and a GTX 460 just for compute, it definitely uses the GTX
> 460 just for calculations?
> Anyway I digress!
> Only problem with 4.2.9 toolkit, there are errors rendering certain
> materials, render results are identical for both GTX 460 and GTX 580M
> . Below are compare images to highlight the problem areas.
> Official Blender 263*
> *Blender 263.1 CUDA 4.2.9 test version*
> Hope this is helpful,
> On 30/04/2012 12:40, Thomas Dinges wrote:
>> Hi David,
>> thanks for offering help. :)
>> Here is a current version of Trunk for win64, compiled with the
>> Toolkit 4.2 and kernels 13, 20, 21 and 30.
>> Best regards,
>> Am 29.04.2012 22:31, schrieb David Black:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>> Do you have a download link for your compiled version with 4.2.9?
>>> If helpful, can test it for you with both a 1GB GTX 460 and 2GB GTX
>>> 580m then let you know the results, if it crashes/freezes or not.
>>> Hope you're having a great weekend!
>>> On 29/04/2012 17:29, Thomas Dinges wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> I did some extensive testing today with the new (stable release 4.2.9)
>>>> CUDA Toolkit with Blender 2.63 (45996) and current Trunk.
>>>> The results are fine (at least on my GT540 card), could not test other
>>>> cards yet.
>>>> Render time was the same, or in some cases a few seconds better.
>>>> However I experienced 1 serious issue with the Mike Pan BMW Test scene.
>>>> 2.63 compiled with Toolkit 4.2 did not want to render, it frooze at the
>>>> "Packing BVH Triangles". I was unable to kill the Blender process, I had
>>>> to force shut down my computer. This happened 2 times (I did not want to
>>>> test it further).
>>>> I think that this might be a bug in Cycles, because the same scene works
>>>> fine in current Trunk (with the improved BVH code).
>>>> So I would suggest to stick with Toolkit 4.0 for a possible Blender
>>>> 2.63a, but switch to Toolkit 4.2 in SVN and for 2.64. I could not find
>>>> an issue with it and current Trunk.
>>>> Best regards,
>>> Bf-cycles mailing list
>>> Bf-cycles at blender.org
>> Thomas Dinges
>> Blender Developer, Artist and Musician
>> Bf-cycles mailing list
>> Bf-cycles at blender.org
> Bf-cycles mailing list
> Bf-cycles at blender.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bf-cycles