[Bf-committers] *** SPAM *** Weekly Development Notes Followup
Bastien Montagne
montagne29 at wanadoo.fr
Tue Sep 21 09:20:11 CEST 2021
Hi Ryan,
Not sure how you see that as a personal attack? Fact is, I think
spending half a day on something does earns it a note in the weekly report.
And yes, I was frustrated spending time having to demo the issue after
explaining it's cause/source, finding again the exact use case
triggering it, rebuilding both branch and master to ensure it was proper
example, etc. We all have (tight) schedules and I was frustrated this
was considered high priority enough to take it over more pressing
matters for Blender 3.0 upcoming BCon2.
I know that expressing personal frustration may not be a good idea, but
that does not in any case make it a personal attack, sorry if you felt
it like that.
Cheers,
Bastien.
On 9/21/21 8:49 AM, Ryan Inch via Bf-committers wrote:
> Hello Dalai,
> I missed reading Bastien's weekly notes last week or I would have
> brought this issue up then. In Bastien's notes for Week 425 - 09/04
> to 09/10, one of his notes is this: "Spent time on
> re-explaining/re-investigating T9599 (sigh…)."
>
> In what case is it acceptable for a developer to put something like
> this in their official weekly development notes? I was under the
> impression that personal attacks were not tolerated? (And for the
> record it's D9599 not T)
>
> Ryan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers at blender.org
> List details, subscription details or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
More information about the Bf-committers
mailing list