[Bf-committers] Blender developers meeting notes - 2018-10-22

[Bassam Kurdali]

I think that would be a really good goal for 2.81 also. I'm personally not to sure how important backwards compatibility is, especially when fixing problems-in this case it's kind of a shame that it's not a good goal for 2.80 at this point, since there's more of an expectation that things will break.
Bassam

On October 23, 2018 11:42:21 AM EDT, Ricardo Nunes <3rton93 at gmail.com> wrote:
>If I've understood correctly the first "public" release for 2.8 is
>supposed
>to be couple weeks after Bcon'18 so less than 3 weeks from now?
>
>I do agree, though, it'd be nice if color management could be cleaned
>up in
>2.81.
>
>ti 23. lokak. 2018 klo 17.40 Troy Sobotka (troy.sobotka at gmail.com)
>kirjoitti:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 4:07 AM Brecht Van Lommel
><brechtvanlommel at gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > For a completely
>> > different config, we would need to provide some level of backwards
>> > compatibility and agree on the naming, I don't think there is time
>for
>> > that.
>> >
>>
>> I was under the impression 2.8 was a clean break?
>>
>> It strikes me as a horrible idea keeping something like the busted up
>RRT
>> and other crazy things in that config, doubly so that anyone can
>download
>> any configuration they want, or better, revert to an older version of
>> Blender?
>>
>> The configuration really is a horrible mess and could be cleaned up
>in no
>> time.
>>
>> With respect,
>> TJS
>>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> Bf-committers at blender.org
>> https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Bf-committers mailing list
>Bf-committers at blender.org
>https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.